Skip to main content

Architecture Decisions Overview

Introduction

This section documents significant architectural decisions made for the BookWorm project using Architecture Decision Records (ADRs). Each ADR captures the context, decision, rationale, and consequences of important architectural choices that shape the system's design and implementation.

Decision Timeline

ADR Categories

🏗️ Foundation Architecture

ADRTitleStatusImpact
ADR-001Microservices ArchitectureAcceptedHigh
ADR-002Event-Driven Architecture with CQRSAcceptedHigh
ADR-003.NET Aspire for Cloud-Native DevelopmentAcceptedHigh
ADR-016Domain-Driven Design ImplementationAcceptedHigh

💾 Data & Storage

ADRTitleStatusImpact
ADR-004PostgreSQL as Primary DatabaseAcceptedHigh
ADR-010Redis for SignalR ScalingAcceptedMedium
ADR-011RabbitMQ for Message BrokerAcceptedHigh
ADR-013Event Sourcing for OrderingAcceptedMedium

🔒 Security & Identity

ADRTitleStatusImpact
ADR-005Keycloak for Identity ManagementAcceptedHigh

🌐 Communication & Integration

ADRTitleStatusImpact
ADR-006SignalR for Real-time CommunicationAcceptedMedium
ADR-008API Gateway with YARPAcceptedHigh
ADR-017gRPC for Service CommunicationAcceptedMedium
ADR-014SendGrid Email ProviderAcceptedLow

🤖 AI & Intelligence

ADRTitleStatusImpact
ADR-009AI Integration StrategyAcceptedHigh
ADR-012Ollama for LLM RuntimeAcceptedMedium
ADR-020MCP Tools for StandardizationAcceptedMedium
ADR-021Agent-to-Agent CommunicationAcceptedMedium

⚙️ Operations & Deployment

ADRTitleStatusImpact
ADR-007Azure Container Apps DeploymentAcceptedHigh
ADR-015GitHub Actions for CI/CDAcceptedMedium
ADR-018K6 Performance Testing FrameworkAcceptedMedium
ADR-019EventCatalog for Event DocumentationAcceptedLow

Decision Status Distribution

Architecture Impact Analysis

High Impact Decisions (9 ADRs)

These decisions fundamentally shape the system architecture and have wide-reaching consequences:

  • Microservices Architecture - Defines overall system structure
  • Event-Driven CQRS - Determines data flow and consistency patterns
  • .NET Aspire - Cloud-native development approach
  • Domain-Driven Design - Business domain alignment
  • PostgreSQL Database - Data persistence strategy
  • RabbitMQ Message Broker - Async communication backbone
  • Keycloak Identity - Security and authentication foundation
  • API Gateway - External interface and routing
  • AI Integration Strategy - Intelligence capabilities framework

Medium Impact Decisions (8 ADRs)

These decisions significantly affect specific aspects or components:

  • Redis SignalR Scaling - Real-time communication scalability
  • SignalR Realtime - Bi-directional communication capability
  • Event Sourcing - Audit trail and temporal queries
  • gRPC Communication - High-performance inter-service calls
  • Ollama Runtime - Local LLM execution environment
  • MCP Tools - AI agent standardization
  • A2A Communication - Agent interaction protocols
  • GitHub Actions CI/CD - Deployment automation
  • K6 Performance Testing - Quality assurance framework

Low Impact Decisions (4 ADRs)

These decisions address specific functional requirements:

  • SendGrid Email - Email delivery service
  • EventCatalog Documentation - Event schema documentation

Decision Dependencies

Key Architectural Principles

Based on the ADR decisions, BookWorm follows these core principles:

🎯 Business Alignment

  • Domain-Driven Design ensures technical implementation matches business domain
  • Event-Driven Architecture reflects real-world business processes
  • CQRS separates read and write concerns for optimal user experience

🔄 Scalability & Resilience

  • Microservices enable independent scaling and deployment
  • Event Sourcing provides complete audit trails and replay capabilities
  • Container Apps offer serverless scaling and high availability

🤖 AI-First Approach

  • Integrated AI Strategy makes intelligence a core system capability
  • Standardized Tools ensure consistent AI agent interactions
  • Local Runtime provides control over AI model execution

⚡ Performance & Quality

  • Async Communication via events and messaging
  • Real-time Capabilities through SignalR connections
  • Comprehensive Testing with automated performance validation

ADR Process

Creating New ADRs

  1. Identify Decision Need: Significant architectural choice with long-term impact
  2. Research Context: Gather requirements, constraints, and stakeholder input
  3. Evaluate Alternatives: Consider multiple options with pros/cons analysis
  4. Document Decision: Use standard ADR template with clear rationale
  5. Review & Approval: Get stakeholder review before marking as "Accepted"
  6. Update Dependencies: Link related ADRs and update overview

ADR Template Structure

# ADR-XXX: [Decision Title]

## Status

**[Proposed|Accepted|Deprecated|Superseded]** - [Date]

## Context

[Describe the situation and constraints]

## Decision

[What was decided and key implementation details]

## Rationale

[Why this decision was made]

## Implementation

[How the decision is implemented]

## Consequences

### Positive

[Benefits and positive outcomes]

### Challenges

[Drawbacks and risks]

## Alternatives Considered

[Other options that were evaluated]

## Related Decisions

[Links to other relevant ADRs]

Change Management

Modifying Decisions

  • Status Updates: Change status to Deprecated or Superseded
  • New ADRs: Create new decisions that supersede old ones
  • Impact Analysis: Document effects on dependent decisions
  • Migration Path: Provide clear transition strategy

Decision Evolution

ADRs evolve through their lifecycle:

  • ProposedAcceptedImplemented
  • AcceptedDeprecated (when better alternatives emerge)
  • AcceptedSuperseded (when replaced by new decisions)

Success Metrics

The architecture decisions are validated through:

  • System Performance: Response times, throughput, scalability
  • Development Velocity: Time to implement features, deployment frequency
  • Operational Metrics: Uptime, error rates, recovery time
  • Business Metrics: User satisfaction, feature adoption, cost efficiency
  • Quality Metrics: Test coverage, security compliance, maintainability